Many Atlantic Club employees shown here regarding the casino’s last time in business in January were job-hunting at Golden Nugget this week in Atlantic City (Image: AP/Wayne Parry)
When the folks at the Golden Nugget Atlantic City announced an ’emergency jobs fair’ to fill some newly produced customer service spots, they may have barely likely to be greeted by a cast of over a thousand job seekers lining up around the block. And yet the casino opened its doors this week up to a multitude of hopefuls vying to fill just 50 positions; sadly, the employees that are prospective facing the worst chances into the casino.
A lot of the out-of-work were workers that are former the Atlantic Club, which filed for bankruptcy in November 2013 after failing to compete against the newer and larger casinos of Atlantic City. The Atlantic Club had been offered in December for $23.4 million, to be stripped for components, after a last-minute deal with PokerStars.com fell through as a result of concerns over the outstanding indictment on the company’s creator Isai Scheinberg. Some 1,600 people destroyed their jobs whenever it finally shut its doors on January 13th of the 12 months; some had been aided by the casino since its inception.
Golden Nugget general supervisor Tom Pohlman said the casino’s burgeoning business was in part due to the closure associated with the regrettable Atlantic Club. The Golden Nugget is comparable in size, and many regarding the Atlantic’s former customers now frequent the Nugget. Pohlman confirmed that a few thousand former Atlantic customers now have players’ club cards at his casino.
‘It’s essential to us to maintain a specific standard of customer service, and we have to make immediate help,’ he said. ‘It’s unfortunate to see just how people that are many here because this means many people in Atlantic City are out of employment. But there are great prospects here, and we can find the most readily useful of the best.’
Pat Van Woeart among the hopefuls worked in a coffee shop at the Atlantic Club and has now been out of work since it was shut down.’It’s been terrible’ she said. ‘I’ve applied everywhere that will take applications, but nobody is hiring. With food prices going up, even milk is more expensive. This has been really tough. They are all dedicated people and we’re not used to being out of a job. My health advantages are expiring. I desire a job and I need it now.’
Ronnie Martinez is a security that is former at the Atlantic Club. He said: ‘It’s been tough feeding my family. I really hope We get hired here. I have a great work record.’
Even though the casino initially advertised 50 jobs over the two-day fair, Pohlman stated it would try to include 100 more, and this week’s unsuccessful candidates will be considered for high-season summer time work. Employment manager Tina Smith said security and housekeeping divisions were employing at that moment, while dealers were being evaluated over the two-days, with decisions made later.
The good news, however, is that there are signs of the recession abating in brand New Jersey. The state’s unemployment rate had been 7.3 % in December that is down from 9.6 per cent from a year earlier, though there’s still some strategy to use to reach pre-recession degrees of 4.6 percent. By comparison, the December price was 6.6 % nationally, 7.1 percent in New York and 6.9 per cent in Pennsylvania.
MGM Resorts CEO Jim Murren (shown right here, blue tie-left, at the vegas opening of CityCenter’s Aria Casino in ’09) states the casino industry is by nature a close-knit one, but some experts state it’s too inbred to control itself (Image: Ethan Miller/Getty Images North America)
Opponents of gambling into the U.S. have grown to be critical of just how that some state that is new are employing consultants whom they say have hidden agendas and are often employed by pro-gambling lobbies.
Cash-strapped states are looking at industry consultants to advise them about whether to legalize gambling so as to bolster their coffers. These businesses will often draft legislation, set up commissions while making decisions about which operators might be suitable licensees.
But numerous of these specialists’ industry connections are only a little too close to the casino business for the comfort of the anti-gambling brigade, which has announced that private organizations that are hired to vet operators should not have a ‘cozy relationship’ with the gambling enterprises they are meant to be scrutinizing, nor as long as they be acting as gambling industry regulators.
This week, the issue was brought to light in the case of law firm that is consulting & Froelich (which recently became element of Taft) hired by Massachusetts to assist the state decide who should build its first casino in Springfield. Shefsky & Froelich recommended MGM Resorts Overseas, for which it was already players showgirls surfers paradise working as a lobbyist that is registered Illinois.
It’s believed that at the very least 16 states across the U.S. depend on private companies as specialists. So, could it be that these states, searching for a fast fix, and desperate to get their new casinos ready to go as fast as possible, are moving towards an application of semi-privatization of gambling? It’s not the way things are done in states in which gambling is more established, such as Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware, where regulation is famously stringent.
That being said, Massachusetts regulators nevertheless relatively new to the land casino game have actually been, if anything, roundly criticized by industry professionals as being way too stringent and nitpicky, as opposed to the opposite; taking away some credence from anti-gaming critics’ arguments.
Illinois Gaming Board spokesman Gene O’Shea recently measured into the debate, saying: ‘How do you vet your professionals? If a lot of these professionals, in the past or another, have worked for the folks that you’re in charge of regulating, at some time, you are going to have issues utilizing the purity of the investigation.’
Meanwhile, spokesman for the Florida organization that is non-profit Casinos, John Sowinski, attacked the practice in the state of Florida, which will be currently wanting to expand its casino offerings beyond tribal gaming and race, saying: ‘The gambling industry is the one industry that appears to break free with this particular conflict of great interest carte blanche.’
Managing director of Spectrum Gaming Michael Pollock whom represents one of the biggest gambling consultant firms in the U.S., which recently completed research for Florida negated the claims, but, saying, ‘You can’t be in this business if you are prepared to entertain disputes of interest or even a look of a conflict.
‘We make it clear from the outset you what you want to hear, we’re going to tell you what you need to know that we are not necessarily going to tell. And we will maybe not entertain an engagement when a customer seeks an outcome that is particular’ Pollock added.
MGM CEO Jim Murren says the allegations are considering an outsider’s misconception of the gambling industry, which he states is close-knit:
‘This isn’t a huge industry, and gaming law is highly specialized,’ he said. ‘ There are only maybe four or five firms that are experts in gaming law, and they are known by us all, and now we’ve probably utilized them.’
It seems that the casino consulting business is somewhat incestuous, but whether that is merely the character of the industry or something more sinister, is up for debate dependent on your views. What exactly is clear, but, is it’s big business. Spectrum Gaming started life in a brand new Jersey cellar back in 1996 and has since been called one of many fastest-growing personal businesses in the U.S. Its website declares that: ‘Governments, video gaming operators, designers and investors in five continents have retained Spectrum, so we stay ready to serve clients through our offices in Atlantic City, Bangkok, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Las Vegas, Macau, Manila and Tokyo.’
Philadelphia’s Sugarhouse Casino might have some competition if state regulators decide to grant a 2nd city casino permit (Image: G. WIDMAN FOR VISIT PHILADELPHIA™)
Five casinos are arguing that they’re the fit that is right Philadelphia. One casino is stating that the populous city doesn’t need another gambling hallway at all. And still others say they wish there clearly wasn’t any casino gambling into the city to start with.
Those were the arguments heard at a Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board meeting in Harrisburg last week, as five candidates had been allowed 15 minutes each to make their pitch to start a second casino in Philadelphia. They had been accompanied by the SugarHouse Casino, which opposes a second casino joining their operation which has currently been active in the city, as well as a neighbor hood group that doesn’t want a new casino in their backyard.
The five casinos that have been proposed would vary in size and location. Market8 would be a project that is compact up just two acres in Center City. a 2nd choice for Center City would function as the Provence on North Broad Street. Additionally, there are three Southern Philadelphia proposals: a large, sprawling complex known as Casino Revolution is one, while Hollywood Casino Philadelphia and Live! Hotel & Casino are additionally proposing projects within the exact same area.
At the moment, the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee is studying ‘the current condition and future viability of gaming’ in Pennsylvania. In theory, that study could suggest eliminating the current mandate in state video gaming law that says there ‘shall be’ two gambling enterprises in Philadelphia.
Nonetheless, lawyers for SugarHouse said that the state should still wait to be sure before thinking of granting a second permit.
‘ What I ask you doing is, stay your hand,’ said SugarHouse attorney John Donnelly. ‘we ask you to wait, at the bones that are bare until the legislature completes its research.’
Of the five candidates, three made closing arguments at the meeting (Live! Philadelphia and Greenwood Gaming declined doing therefore). Those arguments mostly came as a rebuttal to SugarHouse’s claims that added competition would damage their business and that there weren’t enough gamblers to support a second casino. But some gambling enterprises also had time to tout just what made their proposals that are particular.
‘The fact that individuals are the most experienced developer and operator of casinos, the fact that we know this market, the fact that we have a national database that will immediately populate our gaming base here,’ said Karen Bailey of Pennsylvania Gaming Ventures, rattling off the reasons why she felt their Hollywood Casino was the best deal for the state that we have the certainty of our financing, the fact.
Issues of financing are critical to state officials. In 2010, Pennsylvania took a license for a casino that is second the town far from Foxwoods because they failed to secure the money to create their facility. Now, casinos have been emphasizing the security of their financing that is own to point where most industry experts don’t think it’ll be a problem no matter who is ultimately selected.
That assumes that someone shall be chosen whenever the board makes its choice. It’s possible for the board that is seven-member select none of the casino deals, being a project must be approved by all four legislative appointees and also at least among the governor’s appointees in order to get the license.